Thursday, 27 October 2011

Tribunal fixes Nov 30 to determine jurisdiction on Tinubu's trial



The trial of the former Governor of Lagos State, Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu by the Code of Conduct Tribunal has been adjourned till November 30.
The former governor at the tribunal filed an application seeking to quash the charges against him with the Code of Conduct Tribunal in Abuja.
The Chairman of the tribunal Justice Danladi Haruna fixed November 30 for hearing of the matter after heated arguments from lawyers to the ex-governor.

The attempt to dock the former governor was opposed by his lawyers who argued that since the accused has raised objection to the charges against him, it will be unconstitutional to put him in the dock until the tribunal rules on the preliminary objection.

Tinubu also filled another application raising an objection against the charges and challenging the jurisdiction of the tribunal.

The defence lawyers led by Chief Wole Olanipekun argued that the alleged offence was not committed in the Federal Capital Territory where the former governor was charged and that the prosecutor has abused the court processes since the earlier charges against the accused person in 2007 is still before the court, noting that the prosecutor was wrong to have filed similar charges before the court.

Responding, the prosecutor, Dr Alex Izion argued that the Constitution empowers the Attorney –General to withdraw charges against an accused before judgment is given, and as such, the argument of the defence has no basis in law.

On the issue of jurisdiction, Dr Izion told the tribunal that the court’s federal status allows it to try any matter in any part of the country.

Speaking on the argument that Tinubu has no case to answer, Izion noted that it was too early to ask the prosecutor to prove its case because it can only happen in course of the trial.
While adjourning to November 30 for ruling in the preliminary objections, Justice Haruna assured both parties that they will get a fair trial.

 Tinubu was previously docked at the tribunal on September 21 on the allegation that he operated 10 foreign accounts whilst in office between 1999 and 2007.

He is specifically accused of violating section 7 of the Code of Conduct Bureau and Tribunal Act, Cap C15 LFN, 2004 as amended, by operating the said accounts, an offence punishable under section 23(2) as incorporated under paragraph 18,part 1, fifth Schedule to the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

Tinubu had on the last adjourned date asked a three-man panel of justices of the tribunal presiding over the matter, to grant him to peruse the charge which he said was served on his legal team right inside the court room.

His request came on the day the federal Government withdrew a one-count charge against him dated March 22, which it ab-initio, lodged before the tribunal and replaced it with a fresh three count charge filed on September 20.

WORLD vs BLOCKADE. US Blockade Hampers Cuban Efforts to Combat HIV/AIDS.


Yesterday, October 25th, for the 20th occasion the United Nation General Assembly voted the Cuban project resolution that urges the ending the US criminal economics and commercial blockade imposed to Cuban people for more than five decades. This was the result.


WORLD vs BLOCKADE

Cuba's overwhelming victory in the twenty-Cuban struggle against the blockade at UN
In Favor
Against
Abstentions
186
2
3
                                        (Estados Unidos e Israel)       (Marshall Island, Micronesia and Palau).
Libia y Suecia did not vote

The Cuban Embassy will present a section of short news about the impact of this blockade over daily Cuban people’s life.
US Blockade Hampers Cuban Efforts to Combat HIV/AIDS
The economic, commercial and financial blockade imposed by the United States of America against Cubadisrupts Cuban cooperation with international multilateral organizations devoted to the fight against HIV/AIDS.
In January 2011, the U.S. government seized 4,207,000 dollars from the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria earmarked for the implementation of cooperation projects with Cuba to combat HIV/AIDS and tuberculosis.
This deliberate act prevented the implementation of three projects whose significant impact on the affected population is well known, Cuba’s report on Resolution 65/6 of the United Nations General Assembly entitled "The Need to Put an End to the Economic, Commercial and Financial U.S. Blockade on Cuba" outlines.
This action is even more significant given that it affects funds earmarked for training in the treatment of HIV/AIDS and tuberculosis, as well as prevention and patient assistance. The funds were mainly destined to buying medicine, antiretrovirals and food.
Cuba has condemned this measure as an illegal action that also hinders the international cooperation provided by the United Nations System through its agencies, funds and programs.
U.S. President Barack Obama has nonetheless maintained and further tightened the economic blockade on the island despite the growing demand by the international community to put an end to U.S. hostility towards Cuba, the report indicates.
"The U.S. blockade is in its essence and aims an act of unilateral aggression and a permanent threat to the stability of a country," the document underscores. (PL)


Monday, 24 October 2011

SISTERS’, LADIES, WOMEN… IN THE HOUSE OF GOD

Sisters are built unique. She is a special being, delicate, and fragile. Sisters are to value their uniqueness and carry themselves with the awareness of who and what they are. They should stop debasing themselves.


THE PURPOSE OF THE WOMEN ACCORDING TO GOD’S CREATION; GOD’S CREATION OF MAN: MALE AND FEMALE

What is the purpose of woman according to the Bible? For our basic understanding we must come to the beginning of the Bible to see God’s creation of man and woman. Genesis 1:26-27 says, “And God said, Let us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness; and let them have dominion… And God created man in His image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them”. There are two different verbs used in the creation of man: “make” and “created”. First God said, “Let us make man”. Then the Bible continues, “And God created man”. The word “created” was used when woman was involved. “And God created man in His own image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them” when God created man, He created them male and female.
Sisters need to realize that in the sight of God, it takes a male and a female together to compose the unit called “man”. When God created man, He did not just create one man. He created the male and the female, and together they were called “man”. These verses show us that by ourselves we are not complete. If a brother is by himself, he is not complete, and if a sister is by herself, she is not complete. The only exceptions are with a special arrangement and calling under God’s divine government. In principle, God always looks at two as one unit. When God sees a brother, He spontaneously and automatically sees the brother’s wife. When God sees a sister, he also sees the sister’s husband. For this reason a brother can never say, “I am prevailing, but my wife is defeated”, or “My wife is prevailing, but I am defeated”. This kind of speaking is not healthy, because from God’s perspective there is no such thing. God only sees one unit, made up of male and female. If one half of the unit is prevailing, the other half is also prevailing. If one half is defeated, the other is also defeated. This is not according to our concept. We do not usually realize that this kind of oneness exists between a husband and a wife. But God sees this oneness absolutely and completely. The husband and wife are inseparably and totally one in God’s sight. When we have such a high realization, we will understand that a sister alone is not complete in herself.
MAN’S NEED FOR A WOMAN TO BE HIS HELPER
Genesis 2:18 describes in detail how the woman came into existence: “And Jehovah God said it is not good for the man to be alone; I will make him a helper as his counterpart”. A wife should learn to speak to her dear husband in this way; “It is not good for you to be alone”. This principle is lost in today’s culture. In today’s culture and society, a wife is supposed to be struggling for his “right” as a woman. There is no view or realization that man is alone and needs a counterpart. But what does God say? “It is not good for man to be alone.  I will make him a helper as his counterpart”. When the Lord speaks of woman, He speaks of her as a HELPER. This means that a sister’s existence is with a specific goal. A man might be able to come into existence in a seemingly random way, as if he was born without a goal. But a woman can never come into existence this way. WHY? Because man was simply made, but woman came into existence with a specific purpose in view.
Genesis 2:19-20 says, “And Jehovah God formed from the ground every animal of the field and every bird of heaven, and brought them to the man to see what he would call them; and whatever the man called any living animal, that was its name. And the man gave names to all cattle and to the birds of heaven and to every animal of the field, but for Adam there was not found a helper as his counterpart”. God brought all the animals to Adam, but Adam did not find a helper. In other words, there was a kind of “dating” going on here. God was basically telling Adam, “Pick up one of these animals as your wife. Would you like to marry a lion? Would you like to marry a dog? And Adam was so brilliant that he was able to name all of these creatures according to its likes. But eventually he said, “Not one of these animals matches me. Not one of them can become my wife”. Adam was just not able to find any creature who could meet his need.
After Adam named all of the animals, and realized that none of them matched him, the Bible continues the story: “And Jehovah God caused a deep sleep to fall upon man, and he slept; and He took one of his ribs and closed up the flesh in its place. And Jehovah God built the rib, which He had taken from the man, into a woman and brought her to the man” (Gen.2:21-22). Although this story seems so simple, it is actually an exact picture of what happened as a result of the Lord’s death. In Genesis, Adam slept; on the cross, the Lord “slept”. As he slept, Adam’s side was opened; while the Lord was on the cross, His side was pierced (John 19:34). Jehovah God took something out of Adam, one of his ribs, and used it to build a woman. And in like manner something came out of our Lord Jesus, the blood and water which flowed from His side and this produced the church as His counterpart. In the same way that God sees a man and his wife as one entity, God also sees Christ and the church as one entity.
THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE WOMAN BEING “BUILT”
There are three different words that we have to pay attention to: “made”, “created”, and “built”. “Made” refers to something produced from something else already in existence. Man was made out of dust of the ground (Gen. 2:7). He was made not out something precious, but rather out of something base and common. However, God made man according to His likeness. Man appears just like God. So on one hand, man is precious, having been made according to God’s appearance. But on the other hand, man is corruptible and base, having been made of the dust.
Then for God to accomplish His purpose with man there was the need of something created. “Created” refers to something produced out nothing. We were created in God’s image, and this refers to our spirit. Our body was made out of dust, but our spirit was created out of God’s breath of life. Our created part is much more precious than the part of us which was made. Furthermore, when God’s breath of life came into contact with man’s physical body, a third part of man was produced. Man became a living soul (Gen. 2:7). So from God’s creation of man, we have a spirit, a soul and a body.
But when the Bible speaks of the woman, it says she was built: “And Jehovah God built the rib, which He had taken from the man, into a woman and brought her to the man” (Gen. 2:22). For the man to be produced, it was very simple. God simply formed the dust, with Himself as the pattern, breathed in the breath of life, and man became a living soul. With the woman, however, the matter was more complicated, because the woman was built out of something from Adam. The woman was built out of something from man. WHY WAS SHE BUILT? “And Jehovah God said it is not good for man to be alone; I will make him a helper as his counterpart”. The woman was built to be the helper of the man.
THE WIFE BEING BUILT TO MEET HER HUSBAND’S NEED AND WITH HIS SPIRITUAL PROFIT IN VIEW
Sisters, you need to see again that in the sight of god, the man and the woman are one entity. Then what is the woman’s PLACE? According to the Bible, the woman’s place is that of a helper. This means that a wife’s place is to meet her husband’s need. Because she is a helper to meet her husband’s need, her coming into existence was somewhat complicated. The woman was not “made”. The woman was not “created”. The woman was “built” to meet the need of her husband. This is a profound matter. Anything that is “built” requires a blueprint, which is an exact design according to a specific purpose. Every woman was built according to a blueprint. This blueprint is the man for whom she was built.
There is a different between a man and a woman. A man can be somewhat rough or crude, because he was made. But a woman has to be fine and delicate, because she was built. A man can be common, because he was made. But every woman is specific, because every woman was built in a detailed way according to a specific purpose. This is why sisters are unique. Every sister should realize, “I am special. I was built for a reason. I was built with a purpose. I was built to meet my husband’s need”. And every married brother in the church life should treasure the sister the Lord has given to him. The brothers should realize, “My wife is unique. On the whole earth, there is no other sister like her. She was built to be my helper. She is exactly what I need”.
This realization does not come with today’s culture. The modern thought is that woman should be equal with man, or even stronger than man. To speak of the purpose of a woman’s existence being to meet her husband’s need would be considered nonsense. But according to the Bible, the man and the woman have their respective functions. Between a wife and her husband, who is more fragile? We will all probably agree that it is the woman. But at the same time, which one operates in a greater and finer capacity? Again, it is the wife, because she was built, and not merely made. Anything that is built will be fine and delicate, but anything that is made can be quite rough and coarse. The man was made and the woman was built. This really means that man has no way to compare with woman. A sister is a delicate and precisioned entity. But no matter how wonderful a sister is, she must remember that she was built for one purpose: as a “helper” to her husband. The husband is the blueprint for the sister’s existence.
Man was created with something glorious in view. He was created in God’s image and after God’s likeness for the fulfillment of God’s purpose. But man by himself has no way to attain such a glorious existence. For this reason, God realized that man needs a helper. Who is the helper? All of you dear sisters are the helpers. This kind of help can not come from something which is merely made. This help can only come from something which is built. Every wife is built with her husband’s spiritual profit and gain in view. So sisters, you need to see a profound yet simple vision. You need to see that God never intended for a woman to be a unit by herself. In the sight of god, the husband and wife together are one entity. Then with this realization, you should value who you really are: a “helper”. You were made according to a purpose. What is the purpose? To be a help to your husband. Every wife came into existence by being built according to her husband’s need and with his spiritual profit in view.
SISTERS SHOULD BE PEACEFUL AND RESTFUL: THEY ARE WHO THEY ARE BECAUSE THE LORD BUILT THEM THAT WAY.
You sisters are exactly who you are supposed to be. The Lord is absolutely satisfied with you being the way you are, because He built you in every detail according to the blueprint of your husband. It is a blessing to have this realization from the Lord. This realization will free you sisters from so much unnecessary pressure to change yourself. Sisters often become very frustrated with self-imposed standards. Sisters must realize that who they are in their person is exactly who they are supposed to be. Every sister is the way she is because of her husband’s needs. This includes all of her strengths and weaknesses, and all of the things she would rather change about herself. Sisters do not need to be someone they are not. The sisters should be at peace with how the Lord has built her.
Sisters put a lot of pressures on themselves. Very few sisters are restful and peaceful. A sister usually desires to be someone different than she really is. With almost every sister there is a struggle taking place within her, because she is striving to become what is not. Sisters, you have to realize that you are not intended to be so “spiritual”. You are not intended to be someone different than you already are. You should be restful, because the Lord built you as you are, with the intention that you would be a help to your husband. It is by being who you are that your husband gains the most profit. No husband can ever gain more profit or be more helped by his wife if she tries to become what she is not. Sisters should be restful, joyful, and peaceful. When you become so aware of your limitations, and when you desire to be someone that you cannot be or do something that you cannot do, then you should remember that you were built to be the way you are. You should realize “I was built with this limitation. I was built without this ability. The Lord wants me to be exactly who I am, because that is the best way to meet my husband’s need”. This is why the sisters should be restful and joyful.
The brothers should also have this realization. When a brother is first married, he may try to reform and change his wife. But eventually he should learn to just take her as she is, and be joyful. He should realize “The reason my wife is like this is because I need her to be this way. She was built and designed for me. It is by being exactly who she is that she is a blessing to me from the Lord”. Every husband should appreciate his wife based upon how she was built. Brothers always have their concepts about what a “good wife” should be, but only the Lord knows what kind of helper is best for each husband. The Lord knows how to build a wife to meet her husband’s need and to render him the most spiritual profit.
SISTERS BEING SUBJECT TO THEIR HUSBANDS
For a sister to be the best helper to her husband, she must have a view concerning God’s governmental arrangement. Ephesians 5:22 says, “Wives, be subject to your own husbands as to the Lord”. This verse indicates that in God’s governmental arrangement the husband and the wife have their respective places. It is much easier for a sister to be subject to the Lord than to her husband. Why? Because the Lord is so holy, but her husband is so “dusty”. However, in God’s eyes, the sisters must learn to subject themselves to their husbands, even though they are “dusty”. Perhaps when a sister was first married, she imagined that her husband was made out of gold from the New Jerusalem. Soon every sister finds out that her husband was made out of the dust of the earth. But even so, she still must submit to her husband. As we shall see, this can only be done by the enjoyment of the spirit.


THE HUSBAND LOVING THEIR WIVES
The sisters must submit to their husbands, and the husbands must love their wives. “But as the church is subject to Christ, so also let the wives be subject to their husbands in everything. Husbands, love your wives even as Christ also loved the church and gave Himself up for her” (Eph. 5:24-25). The demand upon the wife is much easier to meet than the demand upon the husband. The husband must love the wife to the degree that Christ loved the church and gave Himself up for her. The husband has to learn to give himself up for his wife. In other words, the husband must lose his personality in the presence of his wife. No lesson is harder for a husband than this. If a husband is always trying to reform his wife, it is because he has not learnt to give himself up for her. Many husband refuse to give up their personalities when there are conflicts at home. This is because they are short of the understanding that each wife is the way she is because that is what is best for her husband.
THE NEED FOR THE WASHING OF THE WATER IN THE WORD
Ephesians 5;26-27 continues, “That He might sanctify her, cleaning her by the washing of the water in the word, that He might present the church to Himself glorious, not having spot or wrinkle or any such things, but that she would be holy and without blemish”. The way that the Lord operates in the church life, cleansing the church by the washing of the water in the word, is also the way the Lord wants to operate in each family. The relationship between husband and wife can be maintained at its highest level only through the continual experience of the washing described in this verse. Once this washing ceases, then God’s sweet arrangement between the husband and the wife also ceases. The enjoyment of washing may the be replaced by doctrinal law-keeping, in which the husband demands submission from his wife, and the wife demands love from her husband.
The Lord’s operation in the family life is according to the same principle as His operation in the church life. He cleanses the church, washing her in the water of the word. The water is the flowing Spirit, the divine life of God. The word here is the instant, living word which the Lord speaks to us. According to Ephesians 6:17, footnote 4, from the Recovery Version, the instant word of the Lord’s speaking comes from the constant word of the Bible. In other words, both the Spirit and the Bible are necessary for the washing. For any family to have the reality of the husband as the head and the wife as helper, the washing of the water in the word is essential. The enjoyment of the spirit with the truth in the Bible will bring both the husband and the wife into their proper roles.
Ephesians 5:23 calls the Lord “the savior of the Body”. The Lord can only be the Savior of the Body by sanctifying us and cleansing us through the washing of the water in the word. Often in our experience we forget that we are fallen, so we attempt to guide our families with our own ethics and moral principles. We maintain an appearance of peace in our family, but without the washing of the Spirit. If this is the case, then a great part of the church life is gone. Problems in the church very often stem from problems in the family life. Even when both the husband and wife love the Lord that does not necessarily mean that the family is spiritually healthy. There must be the spiritual, joint-operation of the husband and wife according to God’s design. For a family to become a blessing to the church there is the desperate need for the washing of the water in the word.
The water in the word” is meaningful utterance. Water is able to wash and to soothe. In such a busy, consuming world, it is easy for us to become a “dry” wife or a “dry” husband. We simply fulfill our family obligations, but without any enjoyment of the water of the word. It is not unusual to lose the sweetness of a family-life that operates in harmony with the Lord. Therefore we need to be daily saved into the reality of a spiritually healthy family life by enjoying the washing of the water in the word. This means to enjoy the Spirit, to enjoy the truth in the Bible, and to allow the constant word of the Bible to become the instant speaking of the Lord to us.
OUR FAMILY BECOMING A BLESSING THROUGH THE ENJOYMENT OF THE SPIRIT
God made man in such a wonderful way. He created a spirit within us, by which we can receive and enjoy Him as the Spirit. Yet for some reason we are always neglecting the Spirit with regard to our family life. We need the water, which is the Spirit, for our family life. When we are washed in the water of the word, then our family life will become soothing, peaceful and enjoyable. In turn, our family will become a blessing to the church.
The subjection of the wife and the love of the husband must take place through the Spirit. Subjection and love that comes out of human strength is of no value. The wife cannot be a help to her husband when she is striving with her natural effort to be subject to her husband, because the element of the Spirit is not there. The Spirit must become the strongest element in the existence of your household. Sisters, your family life, in the church life, must be filled with the fragrance of the Spirit. This does not have to be complicated, but it is absolutely necessary. Sisters should help their husbands and one another to have a strong and healthy spirit. In your family life, perhaps there can be short but genuine prayers before mealtimes. You can keep a Bible near your dinner table, and read a verse before and after eating. There can be many different ways, but you should help your family remain refreshed in the Spirit. Then through the constant cleansing and washing of the water in the word, your family and the entire church life will be richly blessed.

Wednesday, 19 October 2011

ALL WE NEED TO KNOW ABOUT BREAST CANCER

Breast cancer

Mammograms showing a normal breast (left) and a cancerous breast (right).
Breast cancer (malignant breast neoplasm) is cancer originating from breast tissue, most commonly from the inner lining of milk ducts or the lobules that supply the ducts with milk. Cancers originating from ducts are known as ductal carcinomas; those originating from lobules are known as lobular carcinomas. Breast cancer is a disease of humans and other mammals; while the overwhelming majority of cases in humans are women, men can also develop breast cancer.
The size, stage, rate of growth, and other characteristics of the tumor determine the kinds of treatment. Treatment may include surgery, drugs (hormonal therapy and chemotherapy), radiation and/or immunotherapy. Surgical removal of the tumor provides the single largest benefit, with surgery alone being capable of producing a cure in many cases. To somewhat increase the likelihood of long-term disease-free survival, several chemotherapy regimens are commonly given in addition to surgery. Most forms of chemotherapy kill cells that are dividing rapidly anywhere in the body, and as a result cause temporary hair loss and digestive disturbances. Radiation may be added to kill any cancer cells in the breast that were missed by the surgery, which usually extends survival somewhat, although radiation exposure to the heart may cause heart failure in the future. Some breast cancers are sensitive to hormones such as estrogen and/or progesterone, which makes it possible to treat them by blocking the effects of these hormones.
Prognosis and survival rate varies greatly depending on cancer type, staging and treatment, 5-year relative survival varies from 98% to 23%, with an overall survival rate of 85%.
Worldwide, breast cancer comprises 22.9% of all cancers (excluding non-melanoma skin cancers) in women. In 2008, breast cancer caused 458,503 deaths worldwide (13.7% of cancer deaths in women).Breast cancer is more than 100 times more common in women than breast cancer in men, although males tend to have poorer outcomes due to delays in diagnosis.

 

Signs and symptoms

Early signs of breast cancer
Breast cancer showing an inverted nipple, lump and skin dimpling.
The first noticeable symptom of breast cancer is typically a lump that feels different from the rest of the breast tissue. More than 80% of breast cancer cases are discovered when the woman feels a lump. The earliest breast cancers are detected by a mammogram.[10] Lumps found in lymph nodes located in the armpits can also indicate breast cancer.
Indications of breast cancer other than a lump may include changes in breast size or shape, skin dimpling, nipple inversion, or spontaneous single-nipple discharge. Pain ("mastodynia") is an unreliable tool in determining the presence or absence of breast cancer, but may be indicative of other breast health issues.
Inflammatory breast cancer is a particular type of breast cancer which can pose a substantial diagnostic challenge. Symptoms may resemble a breast inflammation and may include itching, pain, swelling, nipple inversion, warmth and redness throughout the breast, as well as an orange-peel texture to the skin referred to as peau d'orange; the absence of a discernible lump delays detection dangerously.
Another reported symptom complex of breast cancer is Paget's disease of the breast. This syndrome presents as eczematoid skin changes such as redness and mild flaking of the nipple skin. As Paget's advances, symptoms may include tingling, itching, increased sensitivity, burning, and pain. There may also be discharge from the nipple. Approximately half of women diagnosed with Paget's also have a lump in the breast.
In rare cases, what initially appears as a fibroadenoma (hard movable lump) could in fact be a phyllodes tumor. Phyllodes tumors are formed within the stroma (connective tissue) of the breast and contain glandular as well as stromal tissue. Phyllodes tumors are not staged in the usual sense; they are classified on the basis of their appearance under the microscope as benign, borderline, or malignant.
Occasionally, breast cancer presents as metastatic disease, that is, cancer that has spread beyond the original organ. Metastatic breast cancer will cause symptoms that depend on the location of metastasis. Common sites of metastasis include bone, liver, lung and brain. Unexplained weight loss can occasionally herald an occult breast cancer, as can symptoms of fevers or chills. Bone or joint pains can sometimes be manifestations of metastatic breast cancer, as can jaundice or neurological symptoms. These symptoms are called non-specific, meaning they could be manifestations of many other illnesses.
Most symptoms of breast disorders, including most lumps, do not turn out to represent underlying breast cancer. Benign breast diseases such as mastitis and fibroadenoma of the breast are more common causes of breast disorder symptoms. Nevertheless, the appearance of a new symptom should be taken seriously by both patients and their doctors, because of the possibility of an underlying breast cancer at almost any age.

Risk factors

The primary risk factors for breast cancer are female sex, age, lack of childbearing or breastfeeding, higher hormone levels, race, economic status and dietary iodine deficiency.
Most cases of breast cancer cannot be prevented through any action on the part of the affected person. The World Cancer Research Fund estimated that 38% of breast cancer cases in the US are preventable through reducing alcohol intake, increasing physical activity levels and maintaining a healthy weight. It also estimated that 42% of breast cancer cases in the UK could be prevented in this way, as well as 28% in Brazil and 20% in China.
Smoking tobacco may increase the risk of breast cancer with the greater the amount of smoking and the earlier in life smoking begins the higher the risk.
In a study of attributable risk and epidemiological factors published in 1995, later age at first birth and not having children accounted for 29.5% of U.S. breast cancer cases, family history of breast cancer accounted for 9.1% and factors correlated with higher income contributed 18.9% of cases. Attempts to explain the increased incidence (but lower mortality) correlated with higher income include epidemiologic observations such as lower birth rates correlated with higher income and better education, possible overdiagnosis and overtreatment because of better access to breast cancer screening, and the postulation of as yet unexplained lifestyle and dietary factors correlated with higher income. One such factor may be past hormone replacement therapy, which was typically more widespread in higher income groups.
The genes associated with hereditary breast-ovarian cancer syndromes usually increase the risk slightly or moderately; the exception is women and men who are carriers of BRCA mutations. These people have a very high lifetime risk for breast and ovarian cancer, depending on the portion of the proteins where the mutation occurs. Instead of a 12 percent lifetime risk of breast cancer, women with one of these genes have a risk of approximately 60 percent.
In more recent years, research has indicated the impact of diet and other behaviors on breast cancer. These additional risk factors include a high-fat diet, alcohol intake, obesity, and environmental factors such as tobacco use, radiation, endocrine disruptors and shiftwork. Although the radiation from mammography is a low dose, the cumulative effect can cause cancer.
In addition to the risk factors specified above, demographic and medical risk factors include:
  • Personal history of breast cancer: A woman who had breast cancer in one breast has an increased risk of getting a second breast cancer.
  • Family history: A woman's risk of breast cancer is higher if her mother, sister, or daughter had breast cancer, the risk becomes significant if at least two close relatives had breast or ovarian cancer. The risk is higher if her family member got breast cancer before age 40. An Australian study found that having other relatives with breast cancer (in either her mother's or father's family) may also increase a woman's risk of breast cancer and other forms of cancer, including brain and lung cancers.
  • Certain breast changes: Atypical hyperplasia and lobular carcinoma in situ found in benign breast conditions such as fibrocystic breast changes are correlated with an increased breast cancer risk.
Those with a normal body mass index at age 20 who gained weight as they aged had nearly double the risk of developing breast cancer after menopause in comparison to women who maintained their weight. The average 60-year-old woman's risk of developing breast cancer by age 65 is about 2 percent; her lifetime risk is 13 percent.

Pathophysiology

Overview of signal transduction pathways involved in apoptosis. Mutations leading to loss of apoptosis can lead to tumorigenesis.
Breast cancer, like other cancers, occurs because of an interaction between the environment and a defective gene. Normal cells divide as many times as needed and stop. They attach to other cells and stay in place in tissues. Cells become cancerous when mutations destroy their ability to stop dividing, to attach to other cells and to stay where they belong. When cells divide, their DNA is normally copied with many mistakes. Error-correcting proteins fix those mistakes. The mutations known to cause cancer, such as p53, BRCA1 and BRCA2, occur in the error-correcting mechanisms. These mutations are either inherited or acquired after birth. Presumably, they allow the other mutations, which allow uncontrolled division, lack of attachment, and metastasis to distant organs. Normal cells will commit cell suicide (apoptosis) when they are no longer needed. Until then, they are protected from cell suicide by several protein clusters and pathways. One of the protective pathways is the PI3K/AKT pathway; another is the RAS/MEK/ERK pathway. Sometimes the genes along these protective pathways are mutated in a way that turns them permanently "on", rendering the cell incapable of committing suicide when it is no longer needed. This is one of the steps that causes cancer in combination with other mutations. Normally, the PTEN protein turns off the PI3K/AKT pathway when the cell is ready for cell suicide. In some breast cancers, the gene for the PTEN protein is mutated, so the PI3K/AKT pathway is stuck in the "on" position, and the cancer cell does not commit suicide.
Mutations that can lead to breast cancer have been experimentally linked to estrogen exposure.
Failure of immune surveillance, the removal of malignant cells throughout one's life by the immune system.
Abnormal growth factor signaling in the interaction between stromal cells and epithelial cells can facilitate malignant cell growth. In breast adipose tissue, overexpression of leptin leads to increased cell proliferation and cancer.
In the United States, 10 to 20 percent of patients with breast cancer and patients with ovarian cancer have a first- or second-degree relative with one of these diseases. Mutations in either of two major susceptibility genes, breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 (BRCA1) and breast cancer susceptibility gene 2 (BRCA2), confer a lifetime risk of breast cancer of between 60 and 85 percent and a lifetime risk of ovarian cancer of between 15 and 40 percent. However, mutations in these genes account for only 2 to 3 percent of all breast cancers.

Diagnosis

While screening techniques (which are further discussed below) are useful in determining the possibility of cancer, a further testing is necessary to confirm whether a lump detected on screening is cancer, as opposed to a benign alternative such as a simple cyst.
Very often the results of noninvasive examination, mammography and additional tests that are performed in special circumstances such as ultrasound or MR imaging are sufficient to warrant excisional biopsy as the definitive diagnostic and curative method.
Both mammography and clinical breast exam, also used for screening, can indicate an approximate likelihood that a lump is cancer, and may also detect some other lesions. When the tests are inconclusive Fine Needle Aspiration and Cytology (FNAC) may be used. FNAC may be done in a GP's office using local anaesthetic if required, involves attempting to extract a small portion of fluid from the lump. Clear fluid makes the lump highly unlikely to be cancerous, but bloody fluid may be sent off for inspection under a microscope for cancerous cells. Together, these three tools can be used to diagnose breast cancer with a good degree of accuracy.
Other options for biopsy include core biopsy, where a section of the breast lump is removed, and an excisional biopsy, where the entire lump is removed.
In addition vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VAB) may help diagnose breast cancer among patients with a mammographically detected breast in women.

Classification

Breast cancers are classified by several grading systems. Each of these influences the prognosis and can affect treatment response. Description of a breast cancer optimally includes all of these factors.
  • Histopathology. Breast cancer is usually classified primarily by its histological appearance. Most breast cancers are derived from the epithelium lining the ducts or lobules, and these cancers are classified as ductal or lobular carcinoma. Carcinoma in situ is growth of low grade cancerous or precancerous cells within a particular tissue compartment such as the mammary duct without invasion of the surrounding tissue. In contrast, invasive carcinoma does not confine itself to the initial tissue compartment.
  • Grade. Grading compares the appearance of the breast cancer cells to the appearance of normal breast tissue. Normal cells in an organ like the breast become differentiated, meaning that they take on specific shapes and forms that reflect their function as part of that organ. Cancerous cells lose that differentiation. In cancer, the cells that would normally line up in an orderly way to make up the milk ducts become disorganized. Cell division becomes uncontrolled. Cell nuclei become less uniform. Pathologists describe cells as well differentiated (low grade), moderately differentiated (intermediate grade), and poorly differentiated (high grade) as the cells progressively lose the features seen in normal breast cells. Poorly differentiated cancers have a worse prognosis.
  • Stage. Breast cancer staging using the TNM system is based on the size of thetumor (T), whether or not the tumor has spread to the lymph nodes (N) in the armpits, and whether the tumor has metastasized (M) (i.e. spread to a more distant part of the body). Larger size, nodal spread, and metastasis have a larger stage number and a worse prognosis.
    The main stages are:
    • Stage 0 is a pre-cancerous or marker condition, either ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS).
    • Stages 1–3 are within the breast or regional lymph nodes.
    • Stage 4 is 'metastatic' cancer that has a less favorable prognosis.
  • Receptor status. Breast cancer cells have receptors on their surface and in their cytoplasm and nucleus. Chemical messengers such as hormones bind to receptors, and this causes changes in the cell. Breast cancer cells may or may not have three important receptors: estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2/neu.
    ER+ cancer cells depend on estrogen for their growth, so they can be treated with drugs to block estrogen effects (e.g. tamoxifen), and generally have a better prognosis.
HER2+ breast cancer had a worse prognosis, but HER2+ cancer cells respond to drugs such as the monoclonal antibody trastuzumab (in combination with conventional chemotherapy), and this has improved the prognosis significantly. Cells with none of these receptors are called basal-like or triple negative.
  • DNA assays. DNA testing of various types including DNA microarrays have compared normal cells to breast cancer cells. The specific changes in a particular breast cancer can be used to classify the cancer in several ways, and may assist in choosing the most effective treatment for that DNA type.

Screening

Breast cancer screening refers to testing otherwise-healthy women for breast cancer in an attempt to achieve an earlier diagnosis. The assumption is that early detection will improve outcomes. A number of screening test have been employed including: clinical and self breast exams, mammography, genetic screening, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging.
A clinical or self breast exam involves feeling the breast for lumps or other abnormalities. Research evidence does not support the effectiveness of either type of breast exam, because by the time a lump is large enough to be found it is likely to have been growing for several years and will soon be large enough to be found without an exam. Mammographic screening for breast cancer uses x-rays to examine the breast for any uncharacteristic masses or lumps. The Cochrane collaboration in 2009 concluded that mammograms reduce mortality from breast cancer by 15 percent but also result in unnecessary surgery and anxiety, resulting in their view that it is not clear whether mammography screening does more good or harm. Many national organizations recommend regular mammography, nevertheless. For the average woman, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends mammography every two years in women between the ages of 50 and 74. The Task Force points out that in addition to unnecessary surgery and anxiety, the risks of more frequent mammograms include a small but significant increase in breast cancer induced by radiation.
In women at high risk, such as those with a strong family history of cancer, mammography screening is recommended at an earlier age and additional testing may include genetic screening that tests for the BRCA genes and / or magnetic resonance imaging. Molecular breast imaging is currently under study and may also be an alternative.

Prevention

Exercise may decrease breast cancer risk. Also avoiding alcohol and obesity. Prophylactic bilateral mastectomy may be considered in patients with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. A 2007 report concluded that women can somewhat reduce their risk by maintaining a healthy weight, drinking less alcohol, being physically active and breastfeeding their children.

Treatment

Breast cancer is usually treated with surgery and then possibly with chemotherapy or radiation, or both. A multidisciplinary approach is preferable. Hormone positive cancers are treated with long term hormone blocking therapy. Treatments are given with increasing aggressiveness according to the prognosis and risk of recurrence.
  • Stage 1 cancers (and DCIS) have an excellent prognosis and are generally treated with lumpectomy and sometimes radiation. HER2+ cancers should be treated with the trastuzumab (Herceptin) regime. Chemotherapy is uncommon for other types of stage 1 cancers.
  • Stage 2 and 3 cancers with a progressively poorer prognosis and greater risk of recurrence are generally treated with surgery (lumpectomy or mastectomy with or without lymph node removal), chemotherapy (plus trastuzumab for HER2+ cancers) and sometimes radiation (particularly following large cancers, multiple positive nodes or lumpectomy).
  • Stage 4, metastatic cancer, (i.e. spread to distant sites) has poor prognosis and is managed by various combination of all treatments from surgery, radiation, chemotherapy and targeted therapies. 10 year survival rate is 5% without treatment and 10% with optimal treatment.

Surgery

Chest after right breast mastectomy
Surgery involves the physical removal of the tumor, typically along with some of the surrounding tissue and frequently sentinel node biopsy.
Standard surgeries include:
If the patient desires, then breast reconstruction surgery, a type of cosmetic surgery, may be performed to create an aesthetic appearance.
In other cases, women use breast prostheses to simulate a breast under clothing, or choose a flat chest.

Medication

Drugs used after and in addition to surgery are called adjuvant therapy. Not all of these are appropriate for every person with breast cancer. Chemotherapy or other types of therapy prior to surgery are called neoadjuvant therapy.
There are currently three main groups of medications used for adjuvant breast cancer treatment: hormone blocking therapy, chemotherapy, and monoclonal antibodies.
Hormone blocking therapy: Some breast cancers require estrogen to continue growing. They can be identified by the presence of estrogen receptors (ER+) and progesterone receptors (PR+) on their surface (sometimes referred to together as hormone receptors). These ER+ cancers can be treated with drugs that either block the receptors, e.g. tamoxifen (Nolvadex), or alternatively block the production of estrogen with an aromatase inhibitor, e.g. anastrozole (Arimidex) or letrozole (Femara). Aromatase inhibitors, however, are only suitable for post-menopausal patients.
Chemotherapy: Predominately used for stage 2-4 disease, being particularly beneficial in estrogen receptor-negative (ER-) disease. They are given in combinations, usually for 3–6 months. One of the most common treatments is cyclophosphamide plus doxorubicin (Adriamycin), known as AC. Most chemotherapy medications work by destroying fast-growing and/or fast-replicating cancer cells either by causing DNA damage upon replication or other mechanisms; these drugs also damage fast-growing normal cells where they cause serious side effects. Damage to the heart muscle is the most dangerous complication of doxorubicin. Sometimes a taxane drug, such as docetaxel, is added, and the regime is then known as CAT; taxane attacks the microtubules in cancer cells. Another common treatment, which produces equivalent results, is cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF). (Chemotherapy can literally refer to any drug, but it is usually used to refer to traditional non-hormone treatments for cancer.)
Monoclonal antibodies: A relatively recent development in HER2+ breast cancer treatment. Approximately 15-20 percent of breast cancers have an amplification of the HER2/neu gene or overexpression of its protein product. This receptor is normally stimulated by a growth factor which causes the cell to divide; in the absence of the growth factor, the cell will normally stop growing. Overexpression of this receptor in breast cancer is associated with increased disease recurrence and worse prognosis. Trastuzumab (Herceptin), a monoclonal antibody to HER2, has improved the 5 year disease free survival of stage 1–3 HER2+ breast cancers to about 87% (overall survival 95%). Trastuzumab, however, is expensive, and approx 2% of patients suffer significant heart damage; it is otherwise well tolerated, with far milder side effects than conventional chemotherapy. Other monoclonal antibodies are also undergoing clinical trials.
A recent analysis of a subset of the Nurses' Health Study data indicated that Aspirin may reduce mortality from breast cancer.

Radiation

Radiotherapy is given after surgery to the region of the tumor bed and regional lymph nodes, to destroy microscopic tumor cells that may have escaped surgery. It may also have a beneficial effect on tumor microenvironment. Radiation therapy can be delivered as external beam radiotherapy or as brachytherapy (internal radiotherapy). Conventionally radiotherapy is given after the operation for breast cancer. Radiation can also be given at the time of operation on the breast cancer- intraoperatively. The largest randomised trial to test this approach was the TAR-GIT-A Trial which found that targeted intraoperative radiotherapy was equally effective at 4-years as the usual several weeks' of whole breast external beam radiotherapy. Radiation can reduce the risk of recurrence by 50-66% (1/2 - 2/3 reduction of risk) when delivered in the correct dose and is considered essential when breast cancer is treated by removing only the lump (Lumpectomy or Wide local excision).

Prognosis

An example of recurrent breast cancer
A prognosis is a prediction of outcome and the probability of progression-free survival (PFS) or disease-free survival (DFS). These predictions are based on experience with breast cancer patients with similar classification. A prognosis is an estimate, as patients with the same classification will survive a different amount of time, and classifications are not always precise. Survival is usually calculated as an average number of months (or years) that 50% of patients survive, or the percentage of patients that are alive after 1, 5, 15, and 20 years. Prognosis is important for treatment decisions because patients with a good prognosis are usually offered less invasive treatments, such as lumpectomy and radiation or hormone therapy, while patients with poor prognosis are usually offered more aggressive treatment, such as more extensive mastectomy and one or more chemotherapy drugs.
Prognostic factors are reflected in the classification scheme for breast cancer including stage, (i.e., tumor size, location, whether disease has spread to lymph nodes and other parts of the body), grade, recurrence of the disease, and the age and health of the patient.
The stage of the breast cancer is the most important component of traditional classification methods of breast cancer, because it has a greater effect on the prognosis than the other considerations. Staging takes into consideration size, local involvement, lymph node status and whether metastatic disease is present. The higher the stage at diagnosis, the poorer the prognosis. The stage is raised by the invasiveness of disease to lymph nodes, chest wall, skin or beyond, and the aggressiveness of the cancer cells. The stage is lowered by the presence of cancer-free zones and close-to-normal cell behaviour (grading). Size is not a factor in staging unless the cancer is invasive. For example, Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) involving the entire breast will still be stage zero and consequently an excellent prognosis with a 10yr disease free survival of about 98%.
The breast cancer grade is assessed by comparison of the breast cancer cells to normal breast cells. The closer to normal the cancer cells are, the slower their growth and the better the prognosis. If cells are not well differentiated, they will appear immature, will divide more rapidly, and will tend to spread. Well differentiated is given a grade of 1, moderate is grade 2, while poor or undifferentiated is given a higher grade of 3 or 4 (depending upon the scale used). The most widely used grading system is the Nottingham scheme; details are provided in the discussion of breast cancer grade.
The presence of estrogen and progesterone receptors in the cancer cell is important in guiding treatment. Those who do not test positive for these specific receptors will not be able to respond to hormone therapy, and this can affect their chance of survival depending upon what treatment options remain, the exact type of the cancer, and how advanced the disease is.
In addition to hormone receptors, there are other cell surface proteins that may affect prognosis and treatment. HER2 status directs the course of treatment. Patients whose cancer cells are positive for HER2 have more aggressive disease and may be treated with the 'targeted therapy', trastuzumab (Herceptin), a monoclonal antibody that targets this protein and improves the prognosis significantly.
Younger women tend to have a poorer prognosis than post-menopausal women due to several factors. Their breasts are active with their cycles, they may be nursing infants, and may be unaware of changes in their breasts. Therefore, younger women are usually at a more advanced stage when diagnosed. There may also be biologic factors contributing to a higher risk of disease recurrence for younger women with breast cancer.

Psychological aspects

The emotional impact of cancer diagnosis, symptoms, treatment, and related issues can be severe. Most larger hospitals are associated with cancer support groups which provide a supportive environment to help patients cope and gain perspective from cancer survivors. Online cancer support groups are also very beneficial to cancer patients, especially in dealing with uncertainty and body-image problems inherent in cancer treatment.
Not all breast cancer patients experience their illness in the same manner. Factors such as age can have a significant impact on the way a patient copes with a breast cancer diagnosis. Premenopausal women with estrogen-receptor positive breast cancer must confront the issues of early menopause induced by many of the chemotherapy regimens used to treat their breast cancer, especially those that use hormones to counteract ovarian function.
On the other hand, a recent study conducted by researchers at the College of Public Health of the University of Georgia showed that older women may face a more difficult recovery from breast cancer than their younger counterparts. As the incidence of breast cancer in women over 50 rises and survival rates increase, breast cancer is increasingly becoming a geriatric issue that warrants both further research and the expansion of specialized cancer support services tailored for specific age groups.

Epidemiology

Age-standardized death from breast cancer per 100,000 inhabitants in 2004.
  no data
  less than 2
  2-4
  4-6
  6-8
  8-10
  10-12
  12-14
  14-16
  16-18
  18-20
  20-22
  more than 22
Worldwide, breast cancer is the most common invasive cancer in women. (The most common form of cancer is non-invasive non-melanoma skin cancer; non-invasive cancers are generally easily cured, cause very few deaths, and are routinely excluded from cancer statistics.) Breast cancer comprises 22.9% of invasive cancers in women and 16% of all female cancers.
In 2008, breast cancer caused 458,503 deaths worldwide (13.7% of cancer deaths in women and 6.0% of all cancer deaths for men and women together). Lung cancer, the second most common cause of cancer-related death in women, caused 12.8% of cancer deaths in women (18.2% of all cancer deaths for men and women together).
The incidence of breast cancer varies greatly around the world: it is lowest in less-developed countries and greatest in the more-developed countries. In the twelve world regions, the annual age-standardized incidence rates per 100,000 women are as follows: in Eastern Asia, 18; South Central Asia, 22; sub-Saharan Africa, 22; South-Eastern Asia, 26; North Africa and Western Asia, 28; South and Central America, 42; Eastern Europe, 49; Southern Europe, 56; Northern Europe, 73; Oceania, 74; Western Europe, 78; and in North America, 90.
The number of cases worldwide has significantly increased since the 1970s, a phenomenon partly attributed to the modern lifestyles.
Breast cancer is strongly related to age with only 5% of all breast cancers occurring in women under 40 years old.

United States

Cancer occurrence in females in the US
By mortality
The lifetime risk for breast cancer in the United States is usually given as about 1 in 8 (12%) of women by age 95, with a 1 in 35 (3%) chance of dying from breast cancer. This calculation assumes that all women live to at least age 95, except for those who die from breast cancer before age 95. Recent work, using real-world numbers, indicate that the actual risk is probably less than half the theoretical risk.
The United States has the highest annual incidence rates of breast cancer in the world; 128.6 per 100,000 in whites and 112.6 per 100,000 among African Americans. It is the second-most common cancer (after skin cancer) and the second-most common cause of cancer death (after lung cancer). In 2007, breast cancer was expected to cause 40,910 deaths in the US (7% of cancer deaths; almost 2% of all deaths). This figure includes 450-500 annual deaths among men out of 2000 cancer cases.
In the US, both incidence and death rates for breast cancer have been declining in the last few years in Native Americans and Alaskan Natives. Nevertheless, a US study conducted in 2005 indicated that breast cancer remains the most feared disease, even though heart disease is a much more common cause of death among women. Many doctors say that women exaggerate their risk of breast cancer.

UK

Breast cancer incidence by age in women (UK) 2006-08
45,000 cases diagnosed and 12,500 deaths per annum.

Developing countries

As developing countries grow and adopt Western culture they also accumulate more disease that has arisen from Western culture and its habits (fat/alcohol intake, smoking, exposure to oral contraceptives, the changing patterns of childbearing and breastfeeding, low parity). For instance, as South America has developed so has the amount of breast cancer. "Breast cancer in less developed countries, such as those in South America, is a major public health issue. It is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women in countries such as Argentina, Uruguay, and Brazil. The expected numbers of new cases and deaths due to breast cancer in South America for the year 2001 are approximately 70,000 and 30,000, respectively." However, because of a lack of funding and resources, treatment is not always available to those suffering with breast cancer.

History

Breast cancer surgery in 18th century
Because of its visibility, breast cancer was the form of cancer most often described in ancient documents. Because autopsies were rare, cancers of the internal organs were essentially invisible to ancient medicine. Breast cancer, however, could be felt through the skin, and in its advanced state often developed into fungating lesions: the tumor would become necrotic (die from the inside, causing the tumor to appear to break up) and ulcerate through the skin, weeping fetid, dark fluid.
The oldest description of cancer was discovered in Egypt and dates back to approximately 1600 BC. The Edwin Smith Papyrus describes 8 cases of tumors or ulcers of the breast that were treated by cauterization. The writing says about the disease, "There is no treatment." For centuries, physicians described similar cases in their practises, with the same conclusion. Ancient medicine, from the time of the Greeks through the 17th century, was based on humoralism, and thus believed that breast cancer was generally caused by imbalances in the fundamental fluids that controlled the body, especially an excess of black bile. Alternatively, patients often saw it as divine punishment. In the 18th century, a wide variety of medical explanations were proposed, including a lack of sexual activity, too much sexual activity, physical injuries to the breast, curdled breast milk, and various forms of lymphatic blockages, either internal or due to restrictive clothing. In the 19th century, the Scottish surgeon John Rodman said that fear of cancer caused cancer, and that this anxiety, learned by example from the mother, accounted for breast cancer's tendency to run in families.
Although breast cancer was known in ancient times, it was uncommon until the 19th century, when improvements in sanitation and control of deadly infectious diseases resulted in dramatic increases in lifespan. Previously, most women had died too young to have developed breast cancer. Additionally, early and frequent childbearing and breastfeeding probably reduced the rate of breast cancer development in those women who did survive to middle age.
Because ancient medicine believed that the cause was systemic, rather than local, and because surgery carried a high mortality rate, the preferred treatments tended to be pharmacological rather than surgical. Herbal and mineral preparations, especially involving the poisons hemlock or arsenic, were relatively common.
Mastectomy for breast cancer was performed at least as early as 548 CE, when it was proposed by the court physician Aetios of Amida to Theodora. It was not until doctors achieved greater understanding of the circulatory system in the 17th century that they could link breast cancer's spread to the lymph nodes in the armpit. The French surgeon Jean Louis Petit (1674–1750) and later the Scottish surgeon Benjamin Bell (1749–1806) were the first to remove the lymph nodes, breast tissue, and underlying chest muscle.
Their successful work was carried on by William Stewart Halsted who started performing radical mastectomies in 1882, helped greatly by advances in general surgical technology, such as aseptic technique and anesthesia. The Halsted radical mastectomy often involved removing both breasts, associated lymph nodes, and the underlying chest muscles. This often led to long-term pain and disability, but was seen as necessary in order to prevent the cancer from recurring. Before the advent of the Halsted radical mastectomy, 20-year survival rates were only 10%; Halsted's surgery raised that rate to 50%. Extending Halsted's work, Jerome Urban promoted superradical mastectomies, taking even more tissue, until 1963, when the ten-year survival rates proved equal to the less-damaging radical mastectomy.
Radical mastectomies remained the standard of care in America until the 1970s, but in Europe, breast-sparing procedures, often followed radiation therapy, were generally adopted in the 1950s. One reason for this striking difference in approach may be the structure of the medical professions: European surgeons, descended from the barber surgeon, were held in less esteem than physicians; in America, the surgeon was the king of the medical profession. Additionally, there were far more European women surgeons: Less than one percent of American surgical oncologists were female, but some European breast cancer wards boasted a medical staff that was half female. American health insurance companies also paid surgeons more to perform radical mastectomies than they did to perform more intricate breast-sparing surgeries.
Breast cancer staging systems were developed in the 1920s and 1930s.
During the 1970s, a new understanding of metastasis led to perceiving cancer as a systemic illness as well as a localized one, and more sparing procedures were developed that proved equally effective. Modern chemotherapy developed after World War II.
The French surgeon Bernard Peyrilhe (1737–1804) realized the first experimental transmission of cancer by injecting extracts of breast cancer into an animal.
Prominent women who died of breast cancer include Anne of Austria, the mother of Louis XIV of France; Mary Washington, mother of George, and Rachel Carson, the environmentalist.
The first case-controlled study on breast cancer epidemiology was done by Janet Lane-Claypon, who published a comparative study in 1926 of 500 breast cancer cases and 500 control patients of the same background and lifestyle for the British Ministry of Health.
In the 1980s and 1990s, thousands of women who had successfully completed standard treatment then demanded and received high-dose bone marrow transplants, thinking this would lead to better long-term survival. However, it proved completely ineffective, and 15–20% of women died because of the brutal treatment.
The 1995 reports from the Nurses' Health Study and the 2002 conclusions of the Women's Health Initiative trial conclusively proved that hormone replacement therapy significantly increased the incidence of breast cancer.

Society and culture

Breast cancer awareness

Before the 20th century, breast cancer was feared and discussed in hushed tones, as if it were shameful. As little could be safely done with primitive surgical techniques, women tended to suffer silently rather than seeking care. When surgery advanced, and long-term survival rates improved, women began raising awareness of the disease and the possibility of successful treatment. The "Women's Field Army", run by the American Society for the Control of Cancer (later the American Cancer Society) during the 1930s and 1940s was one of the first organized campaigns. In 1952, the first peer-to-peer support group, called "Reach to Recovery", began providing post-mastectomy, in-hospital visits from women who had survived breast cancer.
The breast cancer movement of the 1980s and 1990s developed out of the larger feminist movements and women's health movement of the 20th century. This series of political and educational campaigns, partly inspired by the politically and socially effective AIDS awareness campaigns, resulted in the widespread acceptance of second opinions before surgery, less invasive surgical procedures, support groups, and other advances in patient care.

Awareness Month

In most countries, October is recognized as National Breast Cancer Awareness Month (NBCAM). The primary purpose is to promote screening mammography as the most effective way to save lives by detecting breast cancer at early stages.
The month features many events, especially fundraisers. Cosmetics company Estée Lauder has sponsored the illumination of landmarks with pink lights. Lee National Denim Day encourages employers to offer a relaxed dress code in return for a small donation to a breast cancer charity. Susan G. Komen for the Cure and other breast cancer organizations hold walkathons and other sponsored athletic events. The ubiquitous presence of pink ribbons and other pink objects has prompted the title "Pinktober". Typically, relatively little money from pink ribbons and tie-in merchandise is donated to the cause.
Some critics call NBCAM the "National Breast Cancer Industry Month" to highlight the conflict of interest between corporations promoting breast cancer awareness while profiting from the resulting increased diagnoses and treatments. Breast Cancer Action says that October is a slick public relations campaign that distracts people from discovering the causes and means of preventing breast cancer and instead focuses on raising awareness as a way to sell mammography equipment and chemotherapy drugs. The term pinkwashing describes the actions of companies that manufacture and use chemicals which may cause breast cancer while simultaneously and hypocritically giving money to breast cancer organizations.

Pink ribbon

The pink ribbon is a symbol to show support for breast cancer awareness
A pink ribbon is the most prominent symbol of breast cancer awareness. Pink ribbons, which can be made inexpensively, are sometimes sold as fundraisers, much like poppies on Remembrance Day. They may be worn to honor those who have been diagnosed with breast cancer, or to identify products that the manufacturer would like to sell to consumers that are interested in breast cancer—usually white, middle-aged, middle-class, educated women.
The pink ribbon is associated with individual generosity, faith in scientific progress, and a "can-do" attitude. It encourages consumers to focus on the emotionally appealing ultimate vision of a cure for breast cancer, rather than on the fraught path between current knowledge and any future cures.
Promotion of the pink ribbon as a symbol for breast cancer has not been credited with saving any lives. Wearing or displaying a pink ribbon has been denounced as a kind of slacktivism, because it has no practical positive effect and as hypocrisy among those who wear the pink ribbon to show good will towards women with breast cancer, but then oppose these women's practical goals, like patient rights and anti-pollution legislation. Critics say that the feel-good nature of pink ribbons and pink consumption distracts society from the lack of progress on preventing and curing breast cancer. It is also criticized for reinforcing gender stereotypes and objectifying women and their breasts. Breast Cancer Action launched the "Think Before You Pink" campaign, and charged that companies have co-opted the pink campaign to promote products that encourage breast cancer, such as high-fat Kentucky Fried Chicken and alcohol.

Breast cancer culture

Breast cancer culture, or pink ribbon culture, is the set of activities, attitudes, and values that surround and shape breast cancer in public. The dominant values are selflessness, cheerfulness, unity, and optimism. Appearing to have suffered bravely is the passport into the culture.
The woman with breast cancer is given a cultural template that constrains her emotional and social responses into a socially acceptable discourse: She is to use the emotional trauma of being diagnosed with breast cancer and the suffering of extended treatment to transform herself into a stronger, happier and more sensitive person who is grateful for the opportunity to become a better person. Breast cancer thereby becomes a rite of passage rather than a disease. To fit into this mold, the woman with breast cancer needs to normalize and feminize her appearance, and minimize the disruption that her health issues cause anyone else. Anger, sadness and negativity must be silenced.
As with most cultural models, people who conform to the model are given social status, in this case as cancer survivors. Women who reject the model are shunned, punished and shamed.
The culture is criticized for treating adult women like little girls, as evidenced by "baby" toys such as pink teddy bears given to adult women.
The primary purposes or goals of breast cancer culture are to maintain breast cancer's dominance as the preëminent women's health issue, to promote the appearance that society is "doing something" effective about breast cancer, and to sustain and expand the social, political, and financial power of breast cancer activists.

Overemphasis

Compared to other diseases or other cancers, breast cancer receives a disproportionate share of resources and attention. In 2001 MP Ian Gibson, chairman of the House of Commons of the United Kingdom all party group on cancer stated "The treatment has been skewed by the lobbying, there is no doubt about that. Breast cancer sufferers get better treatment in terms of bed spaces, facilities and doctors and nurses." Breast cancer also receives significantly more media coverage than other, equally prevalent cancers, with a study by Prostate Coalition showing 2.6 breast cancer stories for each one covering cancer of the prostate. Ultimately there is a concern that favoring sufferers of breast cancer with disproporionate funding and research on their behalf may well be costing lives elsewhere. Partly because of its relatively high prevalence and long-term survival rates, research is biased towards breast cancer. Some subjects, such as cancer-related fatigue, have been studied in little except women with breast cancer.
One result of breast cancer's high visibility is that most women significantly overestimate their personal risk of dying from it. Misleading statistics, such as the claim that one in eight women will be diagnosed with breast cancer during their lives—a claim that depends on the patently unrealistic assumption that no woman will die of any other disease before the age of 95—obscure the reality, which is that about ten times as many women will die from heart disease or stroke than from breast cancer.
The emphasis on breast cancer screening may be harming women by subjecting them to unnecessary radiation, biopsies, and surgery. One-third of diagnosed breast cancers might recede on their own. Screening mammography efficiently finds non-life-threatening, asymptomatic breast cancers and pre-cancers, even while overlooking serious cancers. According to H. Gilbert Welch of the Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, research on screening mammography has taken the "brain-dead approach that says the best test is the one that finds the most cancers" rather than the one that finds dangerous cancers.

Art

Several historical paintings show anomalies that have been interpreted as visible evidence of breast cancer; retrospective diagnoses are discussed in the medical literature. Possible signs of breast cancer such as a typical lump, differences in breast size or shape and the peau d'orange skin texture can be found for example in works by Raphael, Rembrandt and Rubens.
The paintings and the historical context do not give enough information to conclude whether or not the visible changes are really signs of breast cancer and alternative explanations such as tuberculous mastitis or a chronic lactational breast abscess need to be considered.

Research

A considerable part of the current knowledge on breast carcinomas is based on in vivo and in vitro studies performed with breast cancer cell (BCC) lines. These provide an unlimited source of homogenous self-replicating material, free of contaminating stromal cells, and often easily cultured in simple standard media. The first line described, BT-20, was established in 1958. Since then, and despite sustained work in this area, the number of permanent lines obtained has been strikingly low (about 100). Indeed, attempts to culture BCC from primary tumors have been largely unsuccessful. This poor efficiency was often due to technical difficulties associated with the extraction of viable tumor cells from their surrounding stroma. Most of the available BCC lines issued from metastatic tumors, mainly from pleural effusions. Effusions provided generally large numbers of dissociated, viable tumor cells with little or no contamination by fibroblasts and other tumor stroma cells. Many of the currently used BCC lines were established in the late 1970s. A very few of them, namely MCF-7, T-47D, and MDA-MB-231, account for more than two-thirds of all abstracts reporting studies on mentioned BCC lines, as concluded from a Medline-based survey.
Treatments are constantly evaluated in randomized, controlled trials, to evaluate and compare individual drugs, combinations of drugs, and surgical and radiation techniques. The latest research is reported annually at scientific meetings such as that of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, and the St. Gallen Oncology Conference in St. Gallen, Switzerland.These studies are reviewed by professional societies and other organizations, and formulated into guidelines for specific treatment groups and risk category.
List of cell lines
Cell linePrimary tumorOrigin of cellsEstrogen receptorsProgesterone receptorsERBB2 amplificationMutated TP53Tumorigenic in miceReference
600MPEInvasive ductal carcinoma+--[137]
AU565Adenocarcinoma--+-[137]
BT-20Invasive ductal carcinomaPrimaryNoNoNoYesYes[138]
BT-474Invasive ductal carcinomaPrimaryYesYesYesYesYes[139]
BT-483Invasive ductal carcinoma++-[137]
BT-549Invasive ductal carcinoma--+[137]
Evsa-TInvasive ductal carcinoma, mucin-producing, signet-ring typeMetastasis (ascites)NoYes ?Yes ?[140]
Hs578TCarcinosarcomaPrimaryNoNoNoYesNo[141]
MCF-7Invasive ductal carcinomaMetastasis (pleural effusion)YesYesNoNo (wild-type)Yes (with estrogen supplementation)[142]
MDA-MB-231Invasive ductal carcinomaMetastasis (pleural effusion)NoNoNoYesYes[143]
SK-BR-3Invasive ductal carcinomaMetastasis (pleural effusion)NoNoYesYesNo[144]
T-47DInvasive ductal carcinomaMetastasis (pleural effusion)YesYesNoYesYes (with estrogen supplementation)[145]